ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2026
Limited benefit of repeated post-exercise hot water immersion on exercise performance of well-trained cyclists in warm and hot conditions.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study investigated the effects of daily hot water immersion after exercise in cool conditions on the physiological, perceptual, and endurance performance responses of well-trained cyclists in warm and hot conditions.
methodsSixteen male cyclists completed a six-day intervention involving daily cycling exercise for 40 min at 50% of their peak power output at 13.9 ± 0.1 °C, 43.9 ± 5.9% RH followed immediately by either hot water immersion (HWI; n = 8) or thermoneutral water immersion (CON; n = 8) for 40 min. At baseline and post-intervention, participants completed two 30-min continuous cycling tests followed by 20-km time-trial tests on two different days (first at 27.0 ± 0.2 °C, 42.2 ± 3.3% RH and 48 h later at 35.0 ± 1.2 °C, 35.5 ± 3.4% RH).
resultsHot water immersion decreased peak heart rate (p = 0.03), peak thermal sensation (p < 0.01), and peak rating of perceived exertion (p = 0.02) during the 30-min continuous test at 27 °C, and also decreased peak thermal sensation (p = 0.03) and peak rating of perceived exertion (p = 0.01) during the same test at 35 °C. None of these variables was altered in the CON group. The HWI intervention did not affect the time-trial performance in either condition.
conclusionThe findings that post-exercise hot water immersion for six consecutive days had no significant impact on the functioning of the cardiovascular and thermoregulatory systems or endurance performance in the heat suggest that this heat acclimation protocol cannot serve as an effective alternative to active heat acclimation in endurance-trained male individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41432746What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.