ReviewRestorative neurology and neuroscience2026
Ten Recommendations for Improving Research on Stroke Motor Rehabilitation: A Unified Perspective.
Review in Restorative neurology and neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Identifying motor learning deficits in neurological conditions: a critical analysis of a perennial problem.Experimental brain research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stroke motor rehabilitation research is critical for improving functional recovery and quality of life. However, the success of therapeutic interventions is highly dependent on the theoretical basis and methodological rigor of the studies that evaluate them. This paper outlines ten essential recommendations/guidelines for stroke motor rehabilitation research aimed at enhancing the scientific quality and reliability of findings. Our recommendations span issues related to mechanistic understanding, methodological rigor, and transparency, while providing specific suggestions for implementation in the context of stroke motor rehabilitation research. To improve our mechanistic understanding of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.