ArticleJournal of microbiology & biology education2026
Science across generations: establishing best practices for intergenerational learning in course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs).
Article in Journal of microbiology & biology education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Science communication is a powerful tool for disseminating scientific concepts to both STEM and non-STEM audiences. However, undergraduate students are rarely presented with opportunities to practice this skill with non-STEM audiences in their STEM courses. Course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) allow students to engage in authentic research projects in the context of a structured course. CURE courses have been shown to increase numerous psychosocial benchmarks, including science identity and science self-efficacy. We describe the integration of intergenerational partnerships, in which undergraduate students enrolled in CURE courses were paired with older adult community members. We studied these partnerships within three different CUREs. Undergraduate students discussed their CURE research project and formed relationships with older adults from the community during biweekly meetings. As the semester progressed, undergraduate students self-reported gains in their ability to communicate science information to older adults and to the broader community, their understanding of their CURE research projects, and their science identity. Additionally, both science identity and science self-efficacy increased, while science value orientation had a negligible decrease. Here, we provide evidence that incorporating older adult community members can be easily adapted to other STEM classrooms or laboratory courses, providing a meaningful platform for undergraduate students to practice science communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.