Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41432437›Full record

ArticlemSystems2026

Metagenomic analysis of fecal microbiomes reveals genetic potential for diverse hydrogen management strategies in marsupials.

Kate L Bowerman, Yang Lu, Harley McRae, James G Volmer, Julian Zaugg, Phillip B Pope, Philip Hugenholtz, Chris Greening, Mark Morrison, Rochelle M Soo and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mSystems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kate L BowermanAustralian Centre for Ecogenomics, School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2339-114X
Yang LuWater Innovation and Smart Environment Laboratory, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Harley McRaeFrazer Institute, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Behavioural Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
James G VolmerCentre for Microbiome Research, School of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Julian ZauggAustralian Centre for Ecogenomics, School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Phillip B PopeCentre for Microbiome Research, School of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Philip HugenholtzAustralian Centre for Ecogenomics, School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Chris GreeningDepartment of Microbiology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7616-0594
Mark MorrisonFrazer Institute, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Behavioural Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Rochelle M SooAustralian Centre for Ecogenomics, School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Paul N EvansAustralian Centre for Ecogenomics, School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5995-2602

Funding

Australian Government (Federal Government)Department of Education and Training | Australian Research Council (ARC) DP150104202Department of Education and Training | Australian Research Council (ARC) DP210103991Department of Education and Training | Australian Research Council (ARC) FT210100812Meat and Livestock Australia B.STU.1909University of Queensland
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methane is an end product of plant biomass digestion by gut microbiota, though the amount produced and/or released varies between hosts. On a per-unit-of-feed basis, macropodid marsupials (e.g., kangaroos) have been reported to emit less methane than ruminant livestock, despite a similar diet, although measurements exist for only a subset of macropodid species. Competition for hydrogen within the gut microbiome, particularly through alternative hydrogen sinks to methanogenesis, influences methane production; therefore, characterizing hydrogen management strategies within a host system can provide insights into methane emission profiles. In this study, we analyzed 33 fecal microbiomes of 14 marsupial species (predominantly captive animals) to provide the first systematic characterization of methanogen types and hydrogen-cycling genetic capacity across marsupial gut microbiomes. We recovered 1,394 metagenome-assembled genomes and identified host-associated bacterial signatures that varied significantly between marsupial species. Comparative analysis with fecal microbiomes from high- and low-methane-emitting mammals revealed that marsupials display heterogeneous hydrogen management strategies: some harbor elevated methanogenesis genes (mcrA, methanogen-specific hydrogenases), while others show enrichment of bacterial hydrogen-uptake hydrogenases and alternative electron acceptor pathways (nitrate/nitrite reduction, sulfite reduction). This predicted functional variation occurs both between and within marsupial families and gut types, suggesting that hydrogen management capacity may differ within taxonomic and anatomical classifications. These results demonstrate that marsupial gut microbiomes cannot be treated as a functionally homogenous group regarding methane emissions and highlight the need for species-specific measurements to accurately assess their methanogenic potential and inform ecological models of greenhouse gas production.IMPORTANCEHerbivorous marsupials such as kangaroos and wallabies have been reported to produce significantly lower methane emissions than ruminant livestock despite eating a similar diet, yet the microbial mechanisms underlying this difference remain poorly understood. Here, we conduct a comparative study of fecal microbiomes of 14 marsupial species to provide the first investigation of hydrogen-cycling genetic capacity across these animals. Through comparative analysis with fecal microbiomes of high- and low-methane-producing animals, we identify enrichment of bacterial genes for alternative hydrogen uptake and disposal pathways in some marsupials, supporting competition for hydrogen playing a role in the level of methane production. These data also indicate variation in hydrogen management between marsupials, including within species, suggesting methane emission capacity may vary at the level of the individual.

Indexed as

FecesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHydrogenMarsupialiaMetagenomeMetagenomicsAnimalsBacteriaMethaneHydrogenMethanegut microbiomehydrogen sinksmarsupialsmethanogenesisruminants

Identifiers

PMID41432437
PMCPMC12911397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.