ArticleBiomolecules & biomedicine2025
Comparing del Nido and St. Thomas II cardioplegia in a rat ischemia-reperfusion model: Histopathology, mitochondria, and TEM analysis.
Article in Biomolecules & biomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Research Trends in Neutrophil Extracellular Traps and Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury: A Dual-Database Bibliometric Analysis from 2013 to 2025.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myocardial ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury remains a major challenge in cardiac surgery, and comparative histological and ultrastructural data on cardioplegia solutions are limited. This study compared the myocardial protective effects of St. Thomas II and del Nido cardioplegia in a controlled rat IR model, focusing on inflammation, mast cell dynamics, and subcellular preservation. Twenty-four Wistar Albino rats were randomized to Control, St. Thomas II, or del Nido groups. After 90 minutes of ischemia and 30 minutes of passive reperfusion, myocardial tissue was analyzed by hematoxylin-eosin, toluidine blue, and transmission electron microscopy. Outcomes included mast cell counts, leukocyte infiltration, karyolysis, and ultrastructural measures (Flameng score, crista density, basement membrane thickness). Both cardioplegia groups preserved myocardial morphology and attenuated inflammatory changes versus control. Light microscopy revealed a consistent mast cell density and reduced karyolysis in hearts treated with cardioplegia, with no significant differences observed between St. Thomas II and del Nido solutions. Conversely, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), the primary endpoint of this study, demonstrated enhanced mitochondrial and endothelial preservation in the del Nido group, as evidenced by significantly lower Flameng scores and increased crista density compared to both St. Thomas II and control groups (p < 0.05). In conclusion, both solutions reduced early IR-related injury, but del Nido provided a significant ultrastructural advantage on TEM despite similar routine light-microscopic findings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.