Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41432307›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2025

Meta Self-Efficacy Internet Intervention to Support Occupational Health in Young Employees: Protocol for Co-Creation and a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Jan Maciejewski, Roman Cieslak, Per Carlbring, Ewelina Smoktunowicz

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06944990 (Meta Self-efficacy Intervention to Improve Work Self-efficacy and Occupational Well-being in Young Employees), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06944990 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Meta Self-efficacy Intervention to Improve Work Self-efficacy and Occupational Well-being in Young Employees: Internet Intervention Co-creation and a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Social Sciences and Humanities, WarsawRan2026 to 2027Enrolled600ConditionsSelf Efficacy, Occupational Stress, Well-Being, Psychological, Work Related StressArmsMeta self-efficacy internet intervention, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jan MaciejewskiStresLab Research Center, Institute of Psychology, SWPS University, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2696-5113
Roman CieslakStresLab Research Center, Institute of Psychology, SWPS University, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2413-5343
Per CarlbringDepartment of of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2172-8813
Ewelina SmoktunowiczStresLab Research Center, Institute of Psychology, SWPS University, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1748-3876

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSupporting young employees as they navigate the changing workplace requires focus on personal resources. Although self-efficacy is a key and malleable resource, its context specificity limits its applicability. To address this, we propose to target meta self-efficacy, a construct reflecting an individual's ability to leverage self-efficacy sources (mastery experiences, vicarious experiences, persuasion, and affective and physiological states) to build self-efficacy specific to any challenge and, in turn, safeguard their occupational health.

objectiveThe goal of this study is to co-create (co-creation phase) and verify the efficacy (randomized controlled trial [RCT] phase) of an internet intervention enhancing meta self-efficacy to support the occupational health of young employees.

methodsThe co-creation phase will be based on the participatory approach principle and comprise 4 focus groups, where a total of 24 participants will contribute to meta self-efficacy-enhancing activities and identify needs for the intervention format. After each focus group, a preliminary qualitative analysis will be conducted, and the intervention draft will be refined. To detect an effect size of d=0.25, the RCT will use a 2-arm parallel design with a total sample size of 600 comparing the meta self-efficacy intervention against a placebo. Assessments will be conducted at the posttest time point and 3- and 6-month follow-ups, with work self-efficacy as the primary outcome and job stress, job affective well-being, and work capabilities as secondary outcomes, as well as meta self-efficacy as the manipulation check. Data will be analyzed using linear mixed-effects models following the intention-to-treat approach. The trial will also examine the impact of adherence and engagement on intervention outcomes and compare treatment credibility.

resultsAs of November 20, 2025, a total of 24 participants have been recruited, with 3 of 4 focus groups conducted and the final one to be completed by the end of 2025. RCT recruitment is scheduled to start at the beginning of 2026, with the last follow-up expected by the end of 2026.

conclusionsIn comparison to the placebo control, we expect the intervention to significantly improve young employees' work self-efficacy (primary outcome) and occupational well-being (secondary outcomes). If effective, the meta self-efficacy-enhancing intervention could bolster the ability to cope with various challenges in the health domain and beyond, extending the effect beyond the initial occupational context.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT06944990; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06944990. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/85082.

Indexed as

Internet-Based InterventionOccupational HealthSelf EfficacyAdolescentAdultCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInternetMaleRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicWorkplaceYoung Adultinternet interventionjob stressmeta self-efficacyoccupational healthsustainable employabilitywork self-efficacyyoung employees

Identifiers

PMID41432307
PMCPMC12775753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.