ArticleRapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM2026
Pepsin Digestion for Proteomic Studies of the Human Hair Shaft.
Article in Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pepsin Digestion for Proteomic Studies of the Human Hair Shaft.Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
rationaleHuman hair shafts have received increased research interest owing to their easy accessibility and potential as a window for human health. Because the most abundant component in hair is protein, proteomics is a promising tool for studying the molecular composition of hair shafts. As one of the most sophisticated biomaterials, hair shafts also possess unique structures, particularly keratin intermediate filaments, posing challenges for proteomic sample processing. Previously, we discovered that incomplete trypsin proteolysis increased keratin sequence coverage but resulted in an abnormal stoichiometry between types I and II cuticular keratins (PMCID: 12130615).
methodsIn the present study, we explored the potential to re-examine the human hair proteome through pepsin proteolysis and evaluate whether the previously observed type II to type I keratin ratio was due to enzyme biases introduced particularly by trypsin digestion.
resultsAfter optimizing the pepsin digestion conditions, we not only confirmed that previous bias was indeed contributed by trypsin but also discovered that pepsin was more effective at identifying keratin-associated proteins, another main protein component than keratins in human hair shafts.
conclusionsSpectral counting on trypsin-based proteomics has been widely used to study the stoichiometry of protein complexes. For the first time, we confirmed a large bias caused by the trypsin enzyme in spectral counting. We further demonstrated that the use of pepsin can effectively correct such bias. In addition, we discovered that pepsin digestion can better identify keratin-associated proteins than trypsin proteolysis, which offers another effective tool for studying the hair proteome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.