ReviewCancer cytopathology2026
Practical implications of the World Health Organization Reporting System for Lymph Node, Spleen, and Thymus Cytopathology: Categories and ancillary testing for subtyping of hematolymphoid tumors on FNA biopsy cytopathology using a pattern-based approach.
Review in Cancer cytopathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of the recently published World Health Organization Reporting System for Lymph Node, Spleen, and Thymus Cytopathology (WHO system) is to standardize the diagnostic approach to fine-needle aspiration biopsies of hematolymphoid tissues. By categorizing specimens into five diagnostic groups-inadequate/insufficient/nondiagnostic, benign, atypical, suspicious for malignancy, and malignant-the system provides a structured framework that enhances diagnostic clarity and facilitates communication between cytopathologists and clinicians. Each category is associated with a defined risk of malignancy, supporting informed clinical decision making regarding further diagnostic workup. Accurate categorization requires the integration of cytomorphologic features and clinical context, and final and specific diagnoses often require ancillary techniques such as flow cytometry, immunocytochemistry, in situ hybridization, and molecular diagnostics. To assist cytopathologists, especially those less familiar with hematolymphoid neoplasms, the WHO system incorporates a pattern-based diagnostic approach. Four cytopathologic patterns-mixed lymphoid cell; predominantly small/intermediate cell; predominantly large/pleomorphic/blastic cell; and single, very large, atypical cell-serve as guides to narrow down differential diagnoses. However, interpretation can be challenging because of overlapping features, variable inflammatory backgrounds, and limited sample material. This review provides a brief overview of the WHO system and its application to hematolymphoid proliferations, emphasizing the importance of clinical correlation and the use of relevant ancillary techniques. It then provides in-depth discussion of the pattern-based approach to diagnosing hematolymphoid neoplasms on cytopathology. It highlights the strengths and limitations of cytopathologic evaluation in hematolymphoid neoplasms and provides practical insights for applying the WHO system in routine practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.