Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41431741›Full record

ArticleJournal for labour market research2025

Polarised upgrading: the changing occupational structure of large cities in Germany and the UK, 1991-2021.

Daniel Oesch, Katy Morris, Gina-Julia Westenberger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for labour market research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel OeschLIVES Centre, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, 1015 Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1704-853X
Katy MorrisLIVES Centre, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, 1015 Switzerland.
Gina-Julia WestenbergerLIVES Centre, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, 1015 Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An influential thesis predicted in the 1990s that large cities would become polarised as both high-wage professional and low-wage service jobs expanded at the expense of middle-wage workers. We revisit this thesis by analysing change in the occupational class structure of the ten largest cities in Germany and the UK, 1991-2021. Using UK census and German social security data (SIAB), we find for all cities strong job growth at the top - among professionals and managers -, moderate growth at the bottom - among service and sales workers - and a sharp decline in the middle - among office clerks and production workers. The result is occupational class upgrading with a polarised twist. Polarised upgrading was particularly strong in London, but also evident in Birmingham, Liverpool, Manchester or Newcastle. German cities experienced similar levels of occupational upgrading, but less polarisation. Notably in Berlin, Munich and Stuttgart, job growth was heavily concentrated among professionals and managers. While second-tier cities such as Dortmund, Essen or Leipzig also created many professional jobs, they experienced almost as much growth in low-end jobs. We find no evidence that job polarisation is specific to the largest cities or that strong job growth among professionals is limited to a few winner-take-all cities such as London and Berlin.

Indexed as

Class structureEmploymentGlobal citiesOccupational changeUrban labour markets

Identifiers

PMID41431741
PMCPMC12718246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.