ArticleJB & JS open access
Fractures in the System: Local Voices and Global Strategies for Orthopaedic Reform in Nigeria.
Article in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of fracture table availability and usability on surgical decision-making: a national cross-sectional survey of Nigerian orthopaedic surgeons.International orthopaedics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Musculoskeletal trauma accounts for a major share of global disability, yet access to orthopaedic care in low- and middle-income countries remains severely limited. This narrative review explores the systemic disparities in Nigeria, the most populous country in Africa, based on semistructured interviews with orthopaedic surgeons, field observations from a multinational clinical collaboration, and analysis of published literature and policy data. Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted with attending and resident orthopaedic surgeons at a national referral hospital in Lagos. Observational data were gathered during a multi-institutional orthopaedic site visit. Themes were triangulated with the literature from peer-reviewed journals, health policy documents, and global health reports to construct a multilevel review of structural, sociocultural, and economic barriers to musculoskeletal care. Results: We identified 3 major drivers of orthopaedic inequity. First, economic constraints: more than 90% of patients pay out-of-pocket and with implant and surgery costs often exceed annual household income, care is often delayed or forgone. Second, sociocultural barriers: Patients often first seek treatment from traditional bone setters whose unregulated practices result in complications such as malunions, infections, and delayed presentation. Third, workforce-related limitations: Nigeria has fewer than 500 orthopaedic surgeons for more than 200,000,000 people. Many providers report burnout, limited access to advanced training, and a growing desire to emigrate because of low salaries and resource scarcity. Conclusions: Proposed reforms include national insurance expansion, rural trauma center development, regulation of informal care networks, and global-academic partnerships. Orthopaedic equity in Nigeria will require both local leadership and sustained international investment that prioritizes capacity building. This review highlights a scalable collaboration model that may inform future global orthopaedic engagement strategies. Clinical Relevance: This study highlights critical barriers to orthopaedic care delivery in Nigeria, including financial hardship, workforce shortages, and infrastructure deficits, which contribute to delayed treatment and poor surgical outcomes. By identifying locally grounded, cost-effective strategies-such as integrating traditional providers, expanding telemedicine, and building global partnerships-this work offers a scalable framework for improving musculoskeletal care access in low-resource settings worldwide.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.