ArticleCurrent developments in nutrition2025
Trends in Unprocessed Red and Processed Meat Consumption in the Mexican Population, 2006-2020.
Article in Current developments in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Meat consumption trends in Mexico are poorly understood, and this may have implications for Mexico's diet-related disease burden and the sustainability of diets. Objectives: We assessed trends in protein-rich food groups and the contribution of unprocessed red and processed meat to nutrient intake. Methods: We used nationally representative (all ages) dietary information from the Mexican National Health and Nutrition Survey, collected using a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire in 2006, 2012, 2016, 2018, and 2020. We tested for time trends and sociodemographic differences in daily consumption using survey-weighted generalized linear regression, adjusting for total energy intake. The contribution to nutrient intake was assessed from a 2016 24-h dietary recall. Results: Energy-adjusted unprocessed red meat consumption decreased slightly from 2006 to 2020, but processed meat remained unchanged [change in daily consumption (g) per survey cycle (95% confidence interval) Conclusions: Processed meat consumption is well-above dietary targets and has not declined in Mexico, with modest increases among young people, posing potentially negative health and environmental consequences. Meat was a major contributor to heme iron and vitamin B12, but less so (<10%) for other essential nutrients. Therefore, policies to encourage meat reduction, particularly processed meat, are unlikely to adversely affect nutritional status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.