Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41431681›Full record

ReviewAJPM focus2026

Barriers and Enablers to WIC Participation: Review of Evidence From Studies Published Between 2019 and 2024.

Roger Figueroa, Tirna Purkait, Jaclyn Saltzman, Gwyneth Frederick, Ibukun Owoputi, Ruyu Liu, Julio Salas, Katherine Baker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in AJPM focus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Roger FigueroaDivision of Nutritional Sciences, College of Human Ecology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
Tirna PurkaitDepartment of Child, Youth & Family Studies, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska.
Jaclyn SaltzmanMITRE, Bedford, Massachusetts.
Gwyneth FrederickDivision of Nutritional Sciences, College of Human Ecology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
Ibukun OwoputiDivision of Nutritional Sciences, College of Human Ecology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
Ruyu LiuDivision of Nutritional Sciences, College of Human Ecology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
Julio SalasDepartment of Sociology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California.
Katherine BakerSol Price School of Public Policy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) supports low-income mothers and children aged <5 years in the U.S. with nutrition and healthcare resources; however, not all eligible individuals participate. This scoping review aimed to synthesize evidence on factors associated with WIC participation from the perspective of WIC program implementers; WIC participants; and WIC-eligible nonparticipants. Methods: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies published between March 2019 and December 2024 in peer-reviewed journals were included. Eligible studies were U.S. based, were published in English, and included at least 12 participants. Systematic searches were conducted across the following databases: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus. Screening and data extraction were completed in Covidence, and the study quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Results: Among 33 studies included, 15 were qualitative (45.4%), 13 were quantitative (39.3%), and 5 were mixed methods (15.1%). On average, studies met 85.1% of the quality criteria. Overall, the most commonly assessed barriers and enablers were at the organizational level-particularly program logistics and staff interactions. For individual factors, the most assessed concepts were knowledge, awareness, perceptions, and feelings about Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children. Fewer studies examined interpersonal ( Discussion: In summary, there are multiple factors at the individual, interpersonal, organizational, and structural levels that are associated with WIC participation. Barriers and enablers at the individual and organizational levels were most common in the published literature from 2019 to 2024. Although the overall study quality was moderate to high, findings across levels were mixed.

Indexed as

Food assistancefood securitynutrition securityscoping reviewSupplemental Nutrition Assistance Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC)

Identifiers

PMID41431681
PMCPMC12718199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.