ReviewAJPM focus2026
Barriers and Enablers to WIC Participation: Review of Evidence From Studies Published Between 2019 and 2024.
Review in AJPM focus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Addressing Weight Stigma in WIC: A Qualitative Study Exploring Advice and Training Needs of Minnesota WIC Staff.Childhood obesity (Print) · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) supports low-income mothers and children aged <5 years in the U.S. with nutrition and healthcare resources; however, not all eligible individuals participate. This scoping review aimed to synthesize evidence on factors associated with WIC participation from the perspective of WIC program implementers; WIC participants; and WIC-eligible nonparticipants. Methods: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies published between March 2019 and December 2024 in peer-reviewed journals were included. Eligible studies were U.S. based, were published in English, and included at least 12 participants. Systematic searches were conducted across the following databases: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus. Screening and data extraction were completed in Covidence, and the study quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Results: Among 33 studies included, 15 were qualitative (45.4%), 13 were quantitative (39.3%), and 5 were mixed methods (15.1%). On average, studies met 85.1% of the quality criteria. Overall, the most commonly assessed barriers and enablers were at the organizational level-particularly program logistics and staff interactions. For individual factors, the most assessed concepts were knowledge, awareness, perceptions, and feelings about Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children. Fewer studies examined interpersonal ( Discussion: In summary, there are multiple factors at the individual, interpersonal, organizational, and structural levels that are associated with WIC participation. Barriers and enablers at the individual and organizational levels were most common in the published literature from 2019 to 2024. Although the overall study quality was moderate to high, findings across levels were mixed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.