ArticleBone reports2025
A comparative analysis of bone mineral density in cerebral palsy and spinal muscular atrophy.
Article in Bone reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Patients with cerebral palsy (CP) and spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) with immobility are at risk for low bone mineral density (BMD) and fragility fractures. This study investigates whether BMD differs between these two groups given their distinct pathological mechanisms. Methods: Data were collected from non-ambulatory patients diagnosed with CP (GMFCS IV-V) and SMA (type I-II), aged five years and older, who were seen at a metabolic bone clinic between January 2012 and July 2023. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) assessed BMD at the lumbar spine (LS) and lateral distal femur (LDF), region 3 (R3). Z-scores were calculated and compared between groups using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Results: This study included 274 children with CP and 16 with SMA. Unadjusted LS Z-scores were low and comparable in both groups (CP: -2.3, SMA: -2.6; p = 0.7). After adjusting for height, LS Z-scores were in the normal range (CP: -0.9, SMA: -1.6; p = 0.3). However, the SMA group had significantly lower BMD in R3 of the LDF compared to the CP group (CP: -2.9, SMA: -3.9; p = 0.047). Conclusion: Both groups had normal height adjusted LS BMD and low R3 LDF BMD, with the SMA group significantly lower. We theorize that it may be due to the differences in muscle tonicity on the bone. We recommend including the distal femur bone density in routine bone health assessments and that BMD should be adjusted for height when possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.