Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41431618›Full record

ArticleBMJ public health2025

'In this era, the digital era, telehealth is a tool that we can use to provide specialized care': a qualitative evaluation of the implementation of programmes that use digital health to improve antenatal care in rural and jungle areas of Honduras and Peru.

Ariadna Capasso, Carmen Olinda Alcalde Valdivia, Paola Jhosselyn Barrientos Mejía, Melvin Chávez Núñez, Amalia Ayala, Rosa Marlen Flores Oviedo, Gissela Fernandez, Iveth Larissa Moreno, Flor Ramos, Norma Llenny Cruz Vilcarromero and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Ariadna CapassoHealth Resources in Action, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5462-7800
Carmen Olinda Alcalde ValdiviaDirección Regional de Salud de Amazonas, Chachapoyas, Amazonas, Peru.
Paola Jhosselyn Barrientos MejíaPan American Health Organization Honduras, Tegucigalpa, Honduras.
Melvin Chávez NúñezPan American Health Organization Honduras, Tegucigalpa, Honduras.
Amalia AyalaPan American Health Organization Honduras, Tegucigalpa, Honduras.
Rosa Marlen Flores OviedoSecretaría de Salud de la República de Honduras, Tegucigalpa, Honduras.
Gissela FernandezSecretaría de Salud de la República de Honduras, Trinidad, Santa Bárbara, Honduras.
Iveth Larissa MorenoSecretaría de Salud de la República de Honduras, Trinidad, Santa Bárbara, Honduras.
Flor RamosSecretaría de Salud de la República de Honduras, Trinidad, Santa Bárbara, Honduras.
Norma Llenny Cruz VilcarromeroDirección Regional de Salud de Amazonas, Chachapoyas, Amazonas, Peru.
Yeniffer BlassDirección Regional de Salud de Amazonas, Chachapoyas, Amazonas, Peru.
Marly Asunta Zumaeta VillavicencioDirección Regional de Salud de Amazonas, Chachapoyas, Amazonas, Peru.
Luzlita Canta ZumaetaDirección Regional de Salud de Amazonas, Chachapoyas, Amazonas, Peru.
Clyde Cowan Muñoz VargasDirección Regional de Salud de Amazonas, Chachapoyas, Amazonas, Peru.
Julia Beatriz López PuicónDirección Regional de Salud de Amazonas, Chachapoyas, Amazonas, Peru.
Llaquelina Pizarro MendozaHospital Regional Virgen de Fátima, Chachapoyas, Amazonas, Peru.
Ivy Lorena Talavera RomeroPan American Health Organization Perú, Lima, Peru.
Suzanne SerruyaPan American Health Organization, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Bremen de MucioPan American Health Organization, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Mercedes ColomarPan American Health Organization, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7424-5551

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Antenatal care is essential to save lives, yet large disparities in access persist. Leveraging information and communications technologies (ICTs) to deliver maternal care in hard-to-reach areas offers a promising strategy to close this gap. However, integrating ICTs into healthcare systems can be challenging. This qualitative evaluation sought to identify key implementation factors associated with integrating ICTs to improve maternal care in jungle and rural areas. Methods: Between April and June 2024, we conducted 18 semi-structured interviews guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to evaluate two programmes implemented in Santa Bárbara, Honduras, and Amazonas, Peru, between 2022 and 2023. A purposive sample of key informants, comprising technical personnel, administrators, and healthcare providers, was recruited to represent staff at all levels engaged in decision-making and programme implementation. Results: Interviewees perceived that the interventions were feasible and improved the timely detection and management of pregnancy complications. They also reported strengthened interpersonal relationships among healthcare providers and between women and providers. Facilitating factors included the perception that the programmes addressed an urgent need and were aligned with national priorities. In Peru, participants highlighted the national telemedicine platform and robust policy framework regulating telemedicine as important facilitators. In Honduras, they emphasised the programme's adaptability and the use of widely-available technology. Unreliable internet connectivity, weak mobile network signals, overstretched healthcare personnel, and insufficient administrative support for scheduling and coordination were mentioned as barriers. Conclusions: The programmes were perceived as feasible and promising to improve the detection and management of pregnancy complications among women in hard-to-reach areas. Sustained government investment in developing the digital health infrastructure was essential for their adoption and scale-up. A consideration for future programmes is that, while ICTs can enhance the efficiency of healthcare systems, they cannot substitute for an adequate health workforce or essential medical supplies.

Indexed as

Digital HealthPreventive MedicinePrimary PreventionProgram EvaluationQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID41431618
PMCPMC12718589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.