ArticleBMJ public health2025
Initiatives to enhance referral patterns from primary care to specialist kidney care:a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Healthcare Access Through Digital Coordination: A Nationwide Analysis of Obstetrics and Gynecology E-Referral Patterns in Saudi Arabia.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To highlight data on interventions aimed at enhancing referral patterns from primary care to nephrology. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Web of Science and PsycINFO. Eligibility criteria: Studies reporting interventions aimed at decreasing referral volume, reducing wait times and/or increasing guideline-concordant referrals in adult patients with chronic kidney disease from primary care to specialist kidney care, from inception to 15 April 2024. Data extraction and synthesis: Studies were subcategorised based on taxonomy of initiatives, type of intervention and single versus multi-faceted interventions. Our primary outcomes were changes to referral volume, wait times and proportion of guideline-concordant referrals. Data were pooled using a random effects model and a meta-analysis was conducted using pooled mean difference (MD) and OR. Results: 20 studies used single and 13 used more than one intervention. Overall, interventions resulted in an increase in total referrals (MD: 19 referrals per month, 95% CI 7 to 30; I Conclusion: Organisational changes decreased wait times. Overall, interventions increased referral volume and decreased guideline-concordant referrals. The data have implications for designing programmes to improve primary care-nephrology interface in kidney disease management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.