Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41431583›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Exploring the Nexus: Climate Change, Poverty, and Mental Health.

Manpreet Singh, Sampriti Paul, Saptadweep Saha, Jutika Ojah, Bidyut Kr Das

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Manpreet SinghCommunity Medicine, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, IND.
Sampriti PaulCommunity Medicine, Gauhati Medical College and Hospital, Guwahati, IND.
Saptadweep SahaInternal Medicine, Gauhati Medical College and Hospital, Guwahati, IND.
Jutika OjahCommunity Medicine, Gauhati Medical College and Hospital, Guwahati, IND.
Bidyut Kr DasCommunity Medicine, Gauhati Medical College and Hospital, Guwahati, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climate change, poverty, and mental health are interconnected drivers of vulnerability that reinforce one another through complex social and environmental pathways. This narrative review synthesises evidence from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar and comprises relevant research published in English between 1990 and 2025. Many people worldwide who are exposed to dangerous air pollution live in low- and middle-income nations, where economic hardships worsen climate-related challenges. Climate change exacerbates global economic difficulties and heightens poverty by increasing disease prevalence, causing forced migration, and destroying livelihoods. Additionally, communities repeatedly hit by climate disasters experience growing rates of depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress, with the most vulnerable groups suffering the most severe psychological effects. New findings from South and Southeast Asia also indicate that rising temperatures are increasingly linked to negative mental health effects, highlighting climate stress as an escalating public mental health issue. However, data remain fragmented, with few longitudinal or intersectional studies and limited economic assessments from low- and middle-income countries. The review underscores the need for integrated, equity-centred climate and mental health policies, cross-sectoral collaboration, and stronger health system resilience to mitigate these cascading risks.

Indexed as

adaptation strategiesclimate changeeco-anxietyhealth equityintersectionalitymental healthpovertyresiliencesustainable developmentvulnerability

Identifiers

PMID41431583
PMCPMC12718127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.