Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41431552›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Impact of Screen Time on Language Development and Vocabulary Acquisition in Early Childhood: A Systematic Review.

Evangeline C Nwachukwu, Aahana Nigam, Sandeep Sekar Lakshmisai, Priyanka Sakarkar, Roshitha S Bheemaneni, Iana A Malasevskaia

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Evangeline C NwachukwuDepartment of Planning, Research, and Statistics, Nigeria Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Abuja, NGA.
Aahana NigamDepartment of Cardiology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, IRL.
Sandeep Sekar LakshmisaiDepartment of Medicine, SRM Prime Hospital, Chennai, IND.
Priyanka SakarkarDepartment of General Surgery, Princess Royal University Hospital, Orpington, GBR.
Roshitha S BheemaneniDepartment of Gastroenterology, AdventHealth Ocala, Ocala, USA.
Iana A MalasevskaiaPrinciples and Practice of Clinical Research, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Language development in the first few years of life is critical for later academic and social success. With the increasing use of digital devices among preschoolers, there have been concerns about the potential impact of screen time on language outcomes. Existing research presents mixed findings, making it necessary to synthesize current evidence. This systematic review aimed to examine and synthesize empirical evidence on the relationship between screen time and language development in early childhood, with emphasis on factors such as device type, content quality, socioeconomic status, and parent-child interaction. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), EBSCO Open Dissertations, ScienceDirect, and Clinicaltrials.gov for studies published between January 1, 2020, and February 17, 2025. Our inclusion criteria required studies published in the English language, assessed screen time exposure, and measured language outcomes in typically developing preschoolers. Data were extracted using a standardized form. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2), the Risk Of Bias In Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I), and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal tools. The overall certainty of the evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) framework. A total of eight studies met the inclusion criteria, mostly consisting of cross-sectional studies that involved diverse patient populations with sample sizes ranging from 83 to 4,907 participants. The participants were primarily children aged three to six years and/or their parents. These studies mainly focused on measuring the duration of screen time, which averaged between approximately 1.39 and 2.65 hours per day. One study analyzed 44 mobile applications for their learning goals and educational potential. The most commonly reported outcomes were related to language development and vocabulary acquisition, which were assessed through parental surveys and developmental scales. Synthesized evidence suggests that high levels of unsupervised or passive screen time are often linked to weaker language development outcomes in preschoolers. However, screen use that is interactive, educational, and involves caregiver participation appears to mitigate these potential effects. The overall certainty of this evidence, however, remains limited. Future research should prioritize consistent measurement approaches and explore long-term impacts.

Indexed as

childrencommunication skillsdigital mediaearly literacylanguage developmentpreschoolscreen exposurescreen timesmartphonesvocabulary acquisition

Identifiers

PMID41431552
PMCPMC12718534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.