ArticleCureus2025
COVID-19-Related Rhabdomyolysis: A Case Report and Literature Review.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rhabdomyolysis is the release of myoglobin, creatine kinase (CK) and potassium from damaged skeletal muscle into the bloodstream. This can result in life-threatening complications such as arrhythmias, kidney failure, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) and cardiac arrest. The risk of developing rhabdomyolysis in COVID-19 has been published in a handful of case reports and series, although most of the patients in these studies have a strong comorbid history. We present a healthy 21-year-old male patient who presented with CK levels of >450,000 U/L two weeks after non-specific flu-like symptoms, in the absence of a second triggering event, but was found to be COVID-positive. In addition, the cardiac-specific troponins and liver function tests were deranged, which prompted investigations for hepatitis and myocarditis. Broad infectious work-up and imaging studies were negative, and the patient's laboratory derangements were significantly improved >70% after seven days of hospital admission. We also highlight the current literature available about this topic, mainly limited to case reports.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.