ReviewCureus2025
The Role of Large Language Models in Ophthalmology: A Review of Current Applications, Performance, and Future Directions.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are having a significant effect on clinical care as they become increasingly common in society. LLMs are artificial intelligence (AI) systems trained on a large amount of data that use deep learning to understand and generate human language. This enables these models to perform tasks such as answering questions, retrieving necessary information, and summarizing lengthy texts. Ophthalmology represents a unique field where numerous opportunities and innovations can be applied through these models. This review gathers recent studies to assess the current use of LLMs, such as Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer (ChatGPT), in ophthalmic areas, including clinical decision support, documentation, patient education, and medical training. LLMs have shown a remarkable capacity in diagnostic tasks, with GPT-4's performance on ophthalmology board-style assessments and subspecialty diagnostic reasoning matching or almost matching human-level performance. LLMs can also greatly increase workflow efficiency by automating note-taking and patient communication. They can enhance the efficacy and accessibility of medical education by creating educational materials and practice resources. By merging visual inputs with domain-specific data, multimodal and retrieval-augmented models improved their capacity to provide information with greater accuracy and relevance. These technologies are especially helpful in image-rich disciplines, such as ophthalmology, as they can assist in bridging the gap between visual diagnosis and text-based reasoning. Despite its benefits, incorporating AI into clinical care also has serious drawbacks, including the potential for ethical and legal dilemmas, as well as variations in the performance of specialists. LLM trends suggest that advanced, adaptable technologies that maintain anonymity hold considerable promise for enhancing clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.