Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41431518›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Comparative Outcomes of Conventional Bardach Two-Flap Palatoplasty Versus Modified Alveolar Ridge/Crevicular Incision Technique in Isolated Cleft Palate Repair: A Prospective Observational Study.

Saikrishna Degala, Amey Hariani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Saikrishna DegalaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Jagadguru Sri Shivarathreeshwara (JSS) Dental College and Hospital, Mysuru, IND.
Amey HarianiDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Jagadguru Sri Shivarathreeshwara (JSS) Dental College and Hospital, Mysuru, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Isolated cleft palate (CP) disrupts the feeding, speech, and social development of young children. Standard Bardach two-flap palatoplasty effectively closes the defect but can leave large areas of exposed bone along the sides, particularly in wider clefts. The exposed bone may lead to scar formation and restricted jaw growth. A modified version of the two-flap technique uses incisions along the alveolar ridge or within the gum crevice to mobilize tissue, minimize exposed bone, and achieve closure without tension. This study compared the operative efficiency, postoperative complications, and functional outcomes between conventional and modified techniques in pediatric patients with isolated CP. Methodology This prospective, observational study was conducted over a period of 24 months. In total, 24 children aged 12-24 months with Veau I/II isolated CP were divided into the following two groups (n = 12 each): Group A underwent conventional Bardach two-flap palatoplasty, and Group B underwent the modified technique with alveolar ridge/crevicular incisions. All surgeries were performed under general anesthesia with intravelar veloplasty and layered closure using 4-0 Vicryl sutures. The outcomes assessed included operative time, tension-free closure, fistula formation (Pittsburgh classification), nasal regurgitation, uvular morphology, and deciduous teeth eruption patterns. Follow-up was extended to 18 months. Data were analyzed using Fisher's exact test and the independent t-test (p < 0.05). Results Demographic characteristics were comparable between the groups. The mean operative time was 135 minutes (conventional) versus 141.67 minutes (modified) (p = 0.387). Tension-free closure was achieved in eight (66.67%) conventional and 12 (100%) modified cases (p = 0.121). No fistulas or nasal regurgitations occurred in either group. Two (16.67%) patients per group had a minor delay in deciduous tooth eruption (p = 1.0). Uvular morphology was satisfactory in six (50%) conventional and eight (66.67%) modified cases (p = 0.558). All differences were not statistically significant. Conclusions Both conventional and modified two-flap palatoplasty techniques yielded equivalent surgical and functional outcomes, with minimal morbidity in Veau I/II isolated CP repair. The modified approach tended toward better mobilization and tension-free closure in wider defects without increasing the operative time or complications. Larger randomized trials with long-term cephalometric and speech evaluations are recommended to confirm these clinical benefits.

Indexed as

cleft palateflapincisionpalatoplastyprospective

Identifiers

PMID41431518
PMCPMC12718531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.