Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41431516›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Enhancing Prosthetic Workflow With Prototype Constructions in Dental Implant Treatment.

Aleksandar Naydenov, Krasimir Chapanov

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aleksandar NaydenovDepartment of Prosthetic Dental Medicine, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, BGR.
Krasimir ChapanovDepartment of Dental Implantology, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, BGR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This case report presents the concept of fabricating a 3D-printed prototype by outlining the benefits of these preliminary prosthetic constructions during implant treatment in a totally edentulous arch. Our study indicates that the final prosthetic construction anchored over dental implants demonstrates enhanced prosthetic features. Despite the advancements in digital dentistry, which offer significant diagnostic and planning capabilities, the fabrication of the final prosthetic construction remains a challenge even for specialists. This clinical case aims to present an in-house method for producing a 3D-printed prototype of the final prosthetic restoration, thereby minimizing clinical and laboratory errors such as incorrect selection of tooth form, size, and shade, improper occlusal contacts and articulation, suboptimal emergence profiles, and inadequate bridge design.

Indexed as

3d-printedcad/camdental implantologydigital dentistryprototype

Identifiers

PMID41431516
PMCPMC12718629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.