Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41431508›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Anuria Following Solitary Left Renal Vein Ligation: An Old Surgery Myth Is Rigorously Challenged.

Macaulay A Onuigbo, Oni Balonfentse

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Macaulay A OnuigboMedicine, The Robert Larner, M.D. College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, USA.
Oni BalonfentseMedicine, The Robert Larner, M.D. College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A consensus was established over the past several decades that left renal vein ligation, which is sometimes performed intraoperatively to improve surgical exposure and to control bleeding, was an innocuous and safe procedure. This surgical myth is primarily based on collateral venous pathways draining the left kidney post-ligation, with outcomes ranging from mild reversible transient renal dysfunction to no impact on renal function. Nevertheless, there have been some reports of transient renal failure and, rarely, irreversible end-stage renal disease following this procedure. We recently encountered post-operative anuria on post-operative day one with rapidly escalating serum creatinine that tripled in 24 hours and continued to rise. The patient soon started intermittent hemodialysis on post-operative day two and required a total of three alternate daily hemodialysis sessions before urine output returned. Hemodialysis was discontinued, and serum creatinine continued to decrease spontaneously thereafter. She was discharged home on post-operative day eight. Clearly, left renal vein ligation is not always a safe and innocuous procedure, more so in a patient with a single functioning left kidney. This is a call for increased caution and to limit this procedure or, otherwise, to consider vascular surgery repair and re-anastomosis of the ligated left renal vein, before wound closure.

Indexed as

acute kidney injuryanuriaend-stage renal disease (esrd)left renal vein ligationsolitary functional kidneysolitary kidney

Identifiers

PMID41431508
PMCPMC12718532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.