Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41431475›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine open2025

Impact of genomic sequencing information on physicians' treatment recommendations for children with congenital heart disease.

Danton S Char, Natalie T Deuitch, Matthew K Berent, Wendy K Chung, Jon A Krosnick, David Magnus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Danton S CharDivision of Pediatric Cardiac Anesthesia, Department of Anesthesiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
Natalie T DeuitchDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
Matthew K BerentMatt Berent Consulting, Sharon, PA.
Wendy K ChungDivision of Genetics and Genomics, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Jon A KrosnickDepartments of Communication, Political Science, Sustainability, and Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
David MagnusCenter for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Genomic sequencing (GS) is increasingly part of diagnostic evaluations of children with congenital heart disease (CHD). Past research suggests that clinicians might envision the most immediate benefits of GS to be guidance in decisions regarding withdrawal of care and rationing of scarce resources. This study sought to document whether providing GS information to physicians caring for critically ill children with CHD might lead them to alter recommendations regarding care strategies. Methods: A probability sample of 202 cardiologists, cardiac surgeons, neonatologists, and critical-care physicians who provide care for critically ill children with CHD in the United States, using the well-established vignette methodology, were randomly assigned different patient scenarios and different genomic information. Physicians then reported their likelihood of recommending particular treatment options for each patient. Results: Of the participating physicians, 98.3% had seen genetic test results, 84.5% had used results when making recommendations regarding clinical care, 67.5% had seen GS results, and 37.9% had used GS results when making treatment recommendations. In the survey experiments, receipt of GS results predicting intellectual disability, autism, or a childhood onset cancer syndrome each independently significantly reduced the likelihood of physicians recommending surgical palliation, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or heart transplant. Conclusion: This survey demonstrates that physicians caring for critically ill children with CHD might be influenced by genomic results when making recommendations about whether to forego or withdraw certain treatment options. This raises important ethical issues that should be considered carefully in the future.

Indexed as

Congenital heart diseaseCritical careFutilityGenomic testingPediatrics

Identifiers

PMID41431475
PMCPMC12718151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.