ReviewJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025
Contextual Barriers and Facilitators to Exercise-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation in China: A CFIR 2.0-Guided Systematic Review of Policy, Cultural, and Organizational Determinants.
Review in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Facilitators and Barriers to Adherence to Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation Exercise in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure: A Qualitative Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is internationally recognized as an essential component of secondary prevention for coronary heart disease (CHD). However, participation in China remains low. Although barriers to CR have been extensively reported worldwide, China's regional disparities and distinct exercise traditions create context-specific constraints and opportunities. This study conducted a systematic review using the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) 2.0 to identify multi-level factors that facilitate or impede CR implementation within Chinese healthcare systems. Methods: Seven major databases were searched through October 2024 for studies examining determinants of participation in, or delivery of, exercise-based CR among CHD patients or clinical staff. Study quality was evaluated using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, and extracted findings were organized according to the five CFIR 2.0 domains. Results: Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria, and several influences distinctive to the Chinese context were identified. For example, hospitals in better-resourced provinces provided more complete and structured CR services, whereas those in less developed regions faced fragmented referral pathways and severely limited rehabilitation infrastructure. Cultural expectations further shaped engagement, with many patients favoring medication-based management over exercise, despite traditional practices such as Tai Chi and Baduanjin being viewed positively and offering a culturally acceptable entry point for rehabilitation. Digital tools, including mobile-health platforms and wearable devices, increasingly supported participation, particularly where in-person services were difficult to access. At the institutional level, CR implementation was more successful in centers with established multidisciplinary teams and stable funding, while hospitals lacking such support struggled to maintain consistent programs. Conclusion: By clarifying how structural, institutional, and patient-level barriers interact to restrict cardiac rehabilitation in China, the review emphasizes that nationwide advancement will require policy reinforcement, better-trained rehabilitation teams, and implementation approaches tailored to patient needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.