Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41431468›Full record

ArticleBMJ medicine2025

Costs and benefits of early access to new cancer drugs through the US Food and Drug Administration's accelerated approval pathway: retrospective observational study and economic evaluation.

Huseyin Naci, Mahnum Shahzad, Peter Murphy, Yichen Zhang, Rebecca Costa, Joseph S Ross, Anita K Wagner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Navigating the Prescription Drug Information System.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Huseyin NaciPharmaceutical Policy Lab, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7192-5751
Mahnum ShahzadPharmaceutical Policy Lab, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7170-7228
Peter MurphyPharmaceutical Policy Lab, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8864-1416
Yichen ZhangPharmaceutical Policy Lab, London, UK.
Rebecca CostaDivision of Health Policy and Insurance Research, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Joseph S RossInternal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9218-3320
Anita K WagnerPharmaceutical Policy Lab, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1069-6668

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the survival gains and additional Medicare spending associated with early access to new cancer drugs granted accelerated approval by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), compared with access to cancer drugs following completion of confirmatory trials. Design: Retrospective observational study and economic evaluation. Setting: US Medicare programme, which provides health insurance for adults aged 65 years and older. Participants: Medicare beneficiaries who received new cancer drug indications from the time of FDA accelerated approval to conversion to regular approval, withdrawal from the market, or 31 December 2020. Interventions: Use of cancer drugs for indications that initially received FDA accelerated approval between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2020. Main outcomes and measures: Primary outcomes were life year gains and additional Medicare spending associated with cancer drug indications that initially received FDA accelerated approval. Each indications's overall survival benefit to patients, if present, was determined, and a partitioned survival model was developed to estimate the life year gains and incremental Medicare spending attributable to early drug access. Beneficiaries who received accelerated approval indications were followed for survival and spending outcomes until 31 December 2022. Results: An estimated 178 708 Medicare beneficiaries received access to 90 new cancer drug indications from the time of accelerated approval to conversion to regular approval, withdrawal from the market, or 31 December 2020. Seventeen per cent of beneficiaries (n=30 374) received drugs for indications that were ultimately withdrawn, 5574 (3.1%) received drugs for indications that remained under accelerated approval, and 142 760 (79.9%) received drugs for indications that were subsequently converted to regular approval. Overall, 80 885 (45.3%) beneficiaries received drugs for indications that provided an overall survival benefit to patients. Between 2012 and 2022, use of these drug indications was associated with an estimated 76 164 life years gained. Only three accelerated approvals (nivolumab to treat melanoma, pembrolizumab to treat non-small cell lung cancer, and pemetrexed to treat non-small cell lung cancer) accounted for 68.4% (n=52 107 years) of the total life year gains. The estimated additional cost of early access to these drugs to Medicare was $20.1bn (£15.4bn; €17.4bn) corresponding to a mean spending of $263 371 (95% confidence interval $180 139 to $373 884) per life year gained. Additional mean Medicare spending per life year gained ranged from $25 947 ($18 174 to $39 829) for melanoma indications to $4.5m ($3.1m to $12.2m) for breast cancer indications. Conclusions: This study examined the trade-off between the benefits of earlier access to cancer drugs through the FDA's accelerated approval pathway and the uncertainty surrounding their clinical efficacy at the time of market entry. Accelerated approval yielded uneven survival returns, with a small number of drugs accounting for the majority of life year gains. Medicare incurred substantial costs for treatments that, in over half of cases, did not provide an overall survival benefit to patients.

Indexed as

Health policyMedical oncology

Identifiers

PMID41431468
PMCPMC12718571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.