ReviewCNS spectrums2025
Solutions to common issues in the use of LAIs.
Review in CNS spectrums, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Introducing a special collection of CME articles about long-acting injectable antipsychotics.CNS spectrums · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics are highly effective tools for managing serious mental illness, yet their clinical utility is often compromised by logistical and pharmacological complexities. This review serves as a practical guide to optimizing LAI therapy by addressing common clinical hurdles. Maintaining a consistent injection schedule is essential to successful treatment. To improve adherence, clinicians should implement proactive reminder systems-such as phone calls or text messages-and involve family or caregivers in the care plan. When injections are delayed, management strategies must be tailored to the specific medication and the length of the "dosing window". For example, aripiprazole monohydrate (Abilify Maintena) allows a ±7 day window, whereas paliperidone palmitate (Invega Sustenna) provides a +14 day window. If these windows are exceeded, catch-up protocols may involve administering the next dose as soon as possible, utilizing supplemental oral antipsychotics for a bridge period (e.g., 14 days for aripiprazole or 21 days for risperidone), or restarting initiation loading regimens entirely. Clinically significant drug interactions, such as the reduction of aripiprazole or risperidone levels by carbamazepine, can lead to symptom breakthrough. Conversely, CYP450 inhibitors like fluvoxamine or fluoxetine may increase antipsychotic concentrations, necessitating dose reductions. Adverse effects, including drug-induced Parkinsonism and akathisia, should be managed by reducing the LAI dose or switching to agents with lower risk profiles, such as aripiprazole-based products. For akathisia, short-term adjunctive treatments like vitamin B6 or mirtazapine may be utilized until dose adjustments reach steady state. Patient-centered care requires a collaborative approach to substance use, which can exacerbate symptoms or interfere with LAI effectiveness. Clinicians must also engage in nonjudgmental discussions when patients request a return to oral therapy, carefully considering the pharmacokinetic properties of the LAI to time the transition safely. Ultimately, a proactive management plan that addresses these clinical variables is essential for reducing relapse risk and improving long-term quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.