ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2026
Treatment evolution in spinal muscular atrophy: insights from the SMArtCARE registry.
Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Real-world treatments for 5q-spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) have evolved rapidly following the sequential approval of three disease-modifying treatments (DMTs): nusinersen, onasemnogene abeparvovec and risdiplam. The aim of this study was to map the sequence and timing of SMA treatments accurately using the SMArtCARE registry, a disease-specific registry for patients with SMA across 84 participating centres in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. All patients registered in SMArtCARE were included in the analysis. Patients were grouped based on their treatment regimen: those who remained on the first DMT versus those who switched DMT. The impacts of clinical and genetic factors on treatment decisions were evaluated, including age at initiation of treatment, SMN2 copy number, motor function status, the need for ventilator support or tube feeding, and the presence of scoliosis. A total of 2140 patients were included. Of these, 1294 patients (60.5%) initiated treatment with nusinersen, 514 patients (24.0%) with risdiplam and 243 patients (11.4%) with onasemnogene abeparvovec. Overall, 1366 patients (63.8%) remained on the first DMT. Most treatment switches occurred shortly after approval of a new DMT. Notably, most patients who switched showed no change in motor milestone status between the start of the first and the second DMT. In this large real-world cohort, we present the first comprehensive analysis of SMA treatment patterns across all age groups and disease severities. Although most patients remained on the first DMT, switches were observed, mainly after DMT approvals. Decisions to switch appear multifactorial and are not related directly to motor function effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.