ArticleJournal of clinical periodontology2026
Associations Between Restoration Margins and Adjacent Periodontal Status-Longitudinal Results From SHIP-TREND.
Article in Journal of clinical periodontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo investigate the association between dental restorations and adjacent periodontal status over a 7-year period, using data from a population-based cohort study. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe used 7-year follow-up data on the restorative and periodontal statuses of 88,793 tooth surfaces from 2158 SHIP-TREND (Study of Health in Pomerania) participants. Using confounder-adjusted and inverse-probability-weighted generalised estimating equations, we estimated the associations of restoration status with bleeding on probing (BOP), probing depth (PD) and clinical attachment level (CAL).
resultsSurfaces with dental restorations had significantly poorer periodontal outcomes than sound surfaces, with crowns having the greatest impact. At follow-up, filled and crowned surfaces presented higher proportions of adjacent sites with BOP (18.5% and 22.4%, respectively) compared to sound surfaces (15.8%). Similarly, adjusted average PD was 1.93 mm adjacent to sound surfaces, 1.99 mm adjacent to surfaces with fillings and 2.14 mm adjacent to surfaces with crowns. The results remained consistent when the effects of incidentally placed fillings and crowns on follow-up periodontal status were evaluated. Although effect modification by surface type was observed, no consistent patterns emerged across the different outcomes.
conclusionDental restorations can have an adverse effect on periodontal health, emphasising the critical need for precise restorative techniques and post-treatment maintenance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.