ArticleJournal of separation science2025
Development of a Novel Rotor Design for Counter-Current Centrifugal Extraction Based on Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations.
Article in Journal of separation science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development of a Novel Rotor Design for Counter-Current Centrifugal Extraction Based on Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations.Journal of separation science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study introduces an innovative method for continuous multistage liquid-liquid extraction. Addressing challenges like coalescence and settling times that limit efficiency makes centrifugal partition extraction a promising technique for continuous product separation. It combines the benefits of a mixer-settler cascade with centrifugal extractors in one compact apparatus. The working principle is based on centrifugal partition chromatography, where two immiscible liquid phases are contacted inside a rotor, one serving as the mobile phase and the other as the stationary phase. In centrifugal partition extraction, both phases are mobile. The rotating apparatus allows dispersion and reduces settling time compared with static settlers, with its 300 times higher acceleration. To overcome constructional challenges, a novel concept, termed counter-current centrifugal extraction, is introduced in this work. Thereby, the primary objective is to validate the hypothesis that the process is feasible with a modified rotor design consisting of 10 chambers connected by individual ducts. Combined with alternating pump directions, this enables a pseudo-continuous counter-current flow. A proof of concept is investigated using computational fluid dynamics. The methodologies employed yield valuable insights into hydrodynamic performance. Based on these simulations, an optimized geometry for the flow area is developed, where 100% of the total chamber height is utilized as a dispersion zone compared with the previous 45%. The improvements result in elliptical chambers inclined at 35° to the radial direction, with a height of 6 mm and a volume of 1.43 mL. Additionally, baffles are placed inside the chambers opposite to the two inlets, enhancing dispersion of the inflowing phases. Finally, during alternating operation mode, it is demonstrated that ducts with a volume of 0.17 mL lead to an alternating phase ratio between 0.48 and 0.57 inside the chambers, which was repeatable over five simulated switches. This confirms the feasibility of the concept proposed based on hydrodynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.