Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41431213›Full record

ArticleJournal of primary care & community health

Cancer Disparities and the Political Economy of Healthcare Access: A County-Level Analysis in a High-Disparity County.

Marcela Nava, James Earl, Hemali Patel, Monica Cañizares, Lucy Ren, Kerstin Wiggins, Jenny Foster

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marcela NavaThe University of Texas at Arlington, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9144-2060
James EarlCancer Care Services, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
Hemali PatelThe University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, USA.
Monica CañizaresThe University of Texas at Arlington, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-3186-7606
Lucy RenThe University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, USA.
Kerstin WigginsThe University of Texas at Arlington, USA.
Jenny FosterUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7166-5793

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer mortality among Hispanic immigrant women remains disproportionately high in Tarrant County, Texas, despite national improvements. In this region, restrictive healthcare eligibility criteria and fragmented safety net systems limit access to preventive and life-saving care. A reactionary political environment further compounds these barriers. Drawing on the findings of a multi-year mixed-methods study and a subsequent academic-community partnership in Tarrant County, this article examines how governance decisions, fiscal priorities, and institutional policies shape immigrant health access. Using a political economy of health framework, we show how these structural conditions produce and sustain cervical cancer disparities. Qualitative research is essential for documenting how political and structural forces shape health outcomes. However, scholars working in restrictive policy environments within reactionary governance contexts face distinct methodological and ethical pressures. These include scrutiny of research framing, limitations on community collaboration, and risks associated with publicly naming policy-level drivers of inequity. Based on insights from conducting research in a politically contested setting, we identify strategies for maintaining rigor while minimizing harm to both research participants and community partners. These strategies include ethical community-engaged research practices, capacity-building efforts that strengthen local health infrastructures, and strategic framing techniques that communicate findings accurately without increasing political resistance. By pairing empirical analysis with pragmatic guidance for research in reactionary governance contexts, this article demonstrates how qualitative scholarship can contribute to public understanding, institutional reflection, and incremental system change even when direct policy reform is constrained. We ground these insights in cervical cancer survivorship among Hispanic immigrant women in Tarrant County to keep methodological guidance anchored in disease-specific realities.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesHealth Services AccessibilityPoliticsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsEmigrants and ImmigrantsFemaleHispanic or LatinoHumansQualitative ResearchTexascervical cancerhealthcare accessHispanic immigrantspolitical economy of healthreactionary governance

Identifiers

PMID41431213
PMCPMC12743160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.