Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41431209›Full record

ArticleJournal of primary care & community health

A Strategy to Improve Hepatitis B Vaccine Uptake in Hesitant Adults: The Offer-Offer-Test-Vaccinate Approach.

Laura Wangensteen, Fahma Mohamed, Sara S Oberhelman-Eaton, Natalie M Averkamp, Jack A Kiernan, Roshini I Selladurai, Bradley A Bohn, Benjamin Lai, Jason O'Grady

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Laura WangensteenMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-7166-4579
Fahma MohamedMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-1163-4628
Sara S Oberhelman-EatonMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4055-297X
Natalie M AverkampMayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0009-0003-2765-7336
Jack A KiernanMayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-7866-7515
Roshini I SelladuraiMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-7340-508X
Bradley A BohnMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-0410-5995
Benjamin LaiMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6467-6179
Jason O'GradyMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0541-7265

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAdult hepatitis B vaccination coverage in the United States remains low despite updated national recommendations supporting universal adult immunization. Many adults remain unaware of their susceptibility to hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. This quality improvement (QI) study evaluated a stepwise "Offer-Offer-Test-Vaccinate" workflow designed to improve hepatitis B vaccine uptake among vaccine-hesitant adults in a primary care setting.

methodsThis retrospective QI study was conducted at a single primary care clinic in Rochester, Minnesota. Adult patients (≥19 years) seen between October 1, 2022, and October 1, 2024, were routinely offered hepatitis B vaccination during rooming. Two participating physicians implemented an enhanced workflow in which patients who declined vaccination were counseled and then offered serologic screening using the 2023 CDC-recommended triple panel (HBsAg, anti-HBs, and total anti-HBc). Patients with negative serology were notified via the patient portal and reoffered vaccination along with a link to the CDC Vaccine Information Statement. The primary endpoint was initiation of the hepatitis B vaccine series following receipt of negative serology results. Preliminary series-completion data through October 1, 2025, were also assessed.

resultsAmong 501 eligible adults, 104 (20.8%) accepted vaccination at the initial offer. Of the 397 who declined, 106 (26.7%) agreed to serologic testing; 91 (85.8%) were seronegative. Among seronegative patients, 41 (45.1%) subsequently accepted vaccination. Integrating serologic testing increased overall vaccination uptake from 20.8% to 28.9%, an absolute increase of 8.2 percentage points and a relative increase of 39.4%. Approximately 2.6 serologic tests were required to generate 1 additional first-dose vaccination. Preliminary series-completion rates were 74.0% among those vaccinated at the initial offer and 87.8% among those vaccinated following serologic testing. DISCUSSION: In this primary care setting, incorporating serologic testing into the workflow was associated with modestly improved hepatitis B vaccination uptake among vaccine-hesitant adults. Serologic results may help re-engage patients by providing personalized immunity information. Implementation considerations include staffing needs, laboratory access, patient portal engagement, and insurance coverage.

conclusionThe "Offer-Offer-Test-Vaccinate" strategy was associated with a modest increase in hepatitis B vaccine uptake among hesitant adults. This EMR-integrated, stepwise approach may offer a feasible and scalable strategy to reduce missed vaccination opportunities and support HBV prevention in adult primary care.

Indexed as

Hepatitis BHepatitis B VaccinesVaccination CoverageVaccination HesitancyAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMinnesotaPrimary Health CareQuality ImprovementRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultHepatitis B Vaccinescommunity healthelectronic medical recordhealth promotionpreventionprimary care

Identifiers

PMID41431209
PMCPMC12743835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.