ArticleBMC psychology2025
Nuances of balance; parental perspectives around screen use and nature exposure in middle childhood.
Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLimitations of existing screen guidelines combined with the prevalence of parental concerns around children's screen use necessitate the need for novel approaches to screen use management that are family-centred and focus on health-positive rather than restrictive messaging. A health-promoting activity that is inversely associated with excessive child screen use across numerous psychosocial outcomes and may lead to greater improvements in family functioning compared to other activities, is nature exposure. However, the joint and reciprocal relationships between child screen use and nature exposure have not been investigated in the relational family context.
methodsQualitative data was collected from 20 primary caregivers of children aged 5-8 who participated in semi-structured online interviews. A template thematic analysis comprising both deductive (conceptual and definitional scope for coding was determined through an a priori template) and inductive processes guided theme generation.
resultsThree main themes were generated, representing commonalities across parent accounts and intersections between key research areas: (1) 'fixation, obsession and displacement', (2) 'is screen use facilitating opportunities or driving disconnection?' and (3) 'parental self-efficacy is fluid'. The findings reveal meaningful interactions between children's screen use and outdoor time, that map onto the interactional theory of childhood problematic media use. We propose family-based nature activities as an additional protective factor for the etiology of problematic child media use.
conclusionFindings provide a more integrated and nuanced understanding of how children's screen use and engagement with nature interact within the family paradigm. This research may help generate evidence-based alternatives and practical approaches to help parents navigate some of the challenges associated with childhood screen use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.