ArticleParasites & vectors2025
Establishment of a transdermal infection model with Leishmania amazonensis.
Article in Parasites & vectors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLeishmaniasis, a parasitic disease caused by Leishmania protozoa, has various clinical forms and is endemic in Brazil. Traditional experimental infection methods using intradermal and subcutaneous needles do not resemble natural sand fly transmission and are associated with risks of laboratory accidents owing to the use of low-gauge needles. In this study, we investigated the application of microneedles for transdermal (TD) infections to better replicate the deposition of parasites observed in the natural infection environment while ensuring safe handling in the laboratory.
methodsInitial experiments involved inducing TD infections using 1-, 7- or 12-microneedle cartridges, compared with inducing conventional intradermal (ID) infections in the ears of BALB/c mice. Subsequent tests used a 12-microneedle cartridge at different tissue depths (0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0 and 1.5 mm), followed by challenge with different doses of Leishmania amazonensis. In addition, histology and flow cytometry studies were performed 30 min post-infection.
resultsTransdermal infections produced similar lesion development and parasite loads as ID infections. More tissue destruction was induced using the 1- or 7-microneedle cartridge compared to the 12-microneedle cartridge and ID infection. Infection was successfully established at all microneedle depths (0.25, 0.5, 0.75 and 1.0 mm), resulting in comparable lesion thickness across the different experimental groups, with no statistically significant differences observed. The parasite load and lesion thickness were dependent on the inoculum size in the ear infection via the TD route, with efficient lesion progression using 2 × 10
conclusionsThis novel microneedle infection model enables efficient challenge and reduces risks during animal experimentation. This technique holds promise for future studies of leishmaniasis therapy and vaccine development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.