ArticleHead & face medicine2025
Interpretable machine learning with multimodal hearing data for diagnosing endolymphatic hydrops.
Article in Head & face medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to assess the diagnostic value of electrocochleography (ECochG) for identifying endolymphatic hydrops (EH) and to investigate whether integrating multimodal auditory data from ECochG and pure-tone audiometry (PTA) into machine learning models could improve diagnostic accuracy and clinical interpretability.
methodsA prospective cohort of 78 patients (156 ears) with a strong clinical suspicion of EH was evaluated between March and June 2024. ECochG and PTA examinations were performed, and extracted parameters were used to develop and validate multiple machine learning models. Diagnostic performance was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy.
resultsAfter excluding six ears with unrecordable ECochG data, 150 ears were analyzed. Models based solely on ECochG-derived features demonstrated limited diagnostic performance (maximum AUC = 0.61). When multimodal hearing data were incorporated, model performance improved substantially. The Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) model achieved an AUC of 0.92 and an accuracy of 0.73 for predicting the anatomical distribution of EH.
conclusionsIntegrating multimodal auditory data into interpretable machine learning models can markedly improve the diagnostic accuracy of endolymphatic hydrops, providing an objective framework to support early clinical diagnosis and management. However, this study is limited by a small sample size and has not yet been validated across multiple centers. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.