ArticleBMC veterinary research2025
Antigenicity analysis of the recombinant fusion proteins NlpI of Mannheimia haemolytica and DsbA of Pasteurella multocida.
Article in BMC veterinary research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To analyze the antigenic characteristics of the recombinant fusion proteins rNlpI-DsbA (rND) of bovine Mannheimia haemolytica and Pasteurella multocida, respectively, and lay a foundation for the development of bivalent subunit vaccine development. The recombinant rND protein was successfully expressed and used to immunize mice with white oil, propolis, or astragalus polysaccharide adjuvants, respectively. Protective efficacy was evaluated by challenging mice with 5×LD₅₀ of WT M. haemolytica (Mh95) or WT P. multocida (PmA1). The rND–white oil group showed nearly 90% protection against Mh95 and 60% against PmA1, while all PBS controls died within 7 days. No significantly pathological damage was observed in the white oil group after challenge, whereas the other adjuvant groups exhibited tissue lesions following PmA1 infection. Both white oil and propolis adjuvants significantly enhanced antigen-specific IFN-γ responses and IgG titers compared to PBS controls. These results indicate that rND with white oil adjuvant induces strong immune protection and represents a promising cross-protective vaccine candidate. The rND exhibited favorable reactogenicity and immunogenicity and effectively prevented the invasion of homotypic strains. The study’s results laid a foundation for developing subunit vaccines against M. haemolytica and P. multocida.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.