ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences2025
Association between dispensing regulations for extended-release methylphenidate and prescription trends in Japan: an exploratory descriptive study.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn December 2019, a nationwide registration system with strict distribution controls for extended-release methylphenidate (ER-MPH) was introduced to prevent inappropriate use while maintaining treatment access for patients with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). However, its impact on prescription patterns remains unclear.
methodsWe conducted an observational study using Japan’s National Database of Health Insurance Claims from 2016 to 2022. ER-MPH prescription volumes were calculated as defined daily doses per 1,000 individuals. Interrupted time series (ITS) analysis was performed to assess the impact of the 2019 distribution-control policy across age and sex groups. We additionally examined whether regional differences in prescription trends could be explained by access to care by assessing the correlation between ER-MPH prescription volumes and the distribution of board-certified pediatricians using Pearson’s correlation coefficients.
resultsER-MPH prescriptions continued to increase after the 2019 policy implementation, but ITS analysis revealed a substantial slowdown in the growth rate. Prescriptions declined immediately by 7% at policy implementation (level change incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.89–0.96), and the annual growth rate slowed from 27% pre-policy (IRR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.25–1.28) to 9% post-policy (IRR = 1.09, 95% CI: 1.08–1.10) (slope change IRR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.85–0.87). Age-stratified analyses revealed differential impacts: individuals aged < 20 years showed a 47% immediate decline (IRR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.42–0.68) with nearly flat subsequent growth, while adults aged ≥ 20 years had only a 19% reduction (IRR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.79–0.84) and continued slower growth. Sex-specific analyses also showed attenuated growth. The correlation between prescription volumes and pediatrician distribution was weak, indicating no substantial relationship.
conclusionsThe 2019 distribution-control measures markedly attenuated the existing upward trend, especially among individuals aged < 20 years. Although prescription patterns differed by age and sex, these differences alone did not fully explain the overall attenuation, and regional variation showed only weak correlations with pediatrician distribution. These findings suggest that additional factors such as psychiatrist availability and broader healthcare system characteristics may also have influenced prescribing trends, underscoring the need for further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.