Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41430595›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Double jeopardy study protocol: mixed-methods study to understand ANHPI college students at the intersection of sexual violence and anti-Asian racism after COVID-19.

Eunhee Park, Jianchao Lai, Rhea Gandhi, Jenny Lee, Allison Massey, Madison Logan, Grace Nguyen, Sabrina Dou, Jennifer A Wagman

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Eunhee ParkDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Jonathan and Karin Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, 650 Charles E Young Dr S, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, United States. eepark@g.ucla.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6442-8119
Jianchao LaiDepartment of Social Welfare, Luskin School of Public Affairs, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3126-2911
Rhea GandhiSchool of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-9922-787X
Jenny LeeDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Jonathan and Karin Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, 650 Charles E Young Dr S, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-3644-3504
Allison MasseyLuskin School of Public Affairs, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-3510-3279
Madison LoganDepartment of Communication, College of Social Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-8583-1409
Grace NguyenDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, College of Letters and Science, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-4828-5373
Sabrina DouDepartment of Psychology, College of Letters and Science, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-6147-4758
Jennifer A WagmanDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Jonathan and Karin Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, 650 Charles E Young Dr S, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9957-1932

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe rise in anti-Asian hate crimes and the concurrent risk of violence against women has created an urgent need to understand the mental health and help-seeking behaviors of Asian, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander (ANHPI) female college students. However, data on these intersecting issues are scarce, limiting our understanding and the availability of evidence-based advocacy tools and culturally specific services for ANHPI students who have experienced sexual violence. This mixed method study assesses experiences of sexual violence and anti-Asian racism and related mental and physical health among ANHPI students across the University of California (UC) campuses with more than 40% of the students identified as ANHPIs.

methodsThe Double Jeopardy Study uses a mixed-methods approach, combining survey data, qualitative interviews, and participatory-action Transmedia-Photovoice research. These methods are informed by intersectional, community-engaged frameworks and guided by trauma-informed, survivor-centered principles. The Double Jeopardy Study employs a sequential approach of three methodologies: quantitative online surveys; qualitative in-depth interviews; and Trnasmedia-Photovoice. Data are being collected from since September 2021 across all 10 UC campuses. Data collection and analysis are ongoing. DISCUSSION: The findings from this study will be used to inform programs aimed at preventing violence, promoting the health and well-being of ANHPI students, and enhancing services to meet the needs of ANHPI victim-survivors. Additionally, the findings will inform policies that promote culturally specific services for ANHPI student victim-survivors.

Indexed as

Asian American Native Hawaiian and Pacific IslanderCOVID-19RacismSex OffensesStudentsCaliforniaFemaleHumansQualitative ResearchUniversitiesYoung AdultCampus-based violence preventionIntimate partner violenceMixed methods researchParticipatory action researchPreventionPublic health approachSexual violenceTrauma-informed research

Identifiers

PMID41430595
PMCPMC12723919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.