ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025
Utility of the meningoencephalitis panel in management of neonates with temperature instability.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFor infants aged ≤ 60-days evaluated for temperature instability, we sought to ascertain if use of a multiplex meningoencephalitis panel (MEP) decreased length of hospital stay (LOS), antimicrobial length of therapy (LoT), and use of other molecular testing.
methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of infants aged ≤ 60-days hospitalized for temperature instability between 1/2012 and 1/2022. Patients were included if blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cultures were negative for bacterial infection. Patients were categorized into groups by MEP availability and use. LOS, LoT, and use of other molecular tests were compared by MEP usage group.
resultsA total of 2076 patients met study criteria; there was no difference between groups regarding sex, race, ethnicity, or age at admission. During the period of MEP availability (2017–2022), the test was performed for 156/1101 (14%) patients. Compared to eligible patients without the MEP performed, MEP use was associated with longer LOS (57.7 vs. 47.3 h, p < 0.0001) and longer LoT (37.4 vs. 35.5 h, p < 0.0001). Use of the MEP was also associated with performance of additional molecular tests. Patients with CSF obtained after antimicrobial initiation had longer LOS compared to those with CSF obtained before antimicrobials were initiated, and MEP use did not mitigate that.
conclusionsYoung infants without bacterial infection by blood or CSF culture that had the MEP performed had longer length of hospital stays, longer duration of antimicrobial therapy, and more molecular testing performed compared to those without the MEP performed. Further research focusing on clinical scenarios where MEP use may be most beneficial for infants with temperature instability is needed. CLINICAL TRIAL: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.