ArticleInternational journal of emergency medicine2025
Acute compartment syndrome following Bitis viper envenomation: a literature review with case reports.
Article in International journal of emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSnakebites caused by Bitis nasicornis and Bitis gabonica are rare but can lead to severe systemic and local complications, including acute compartment syndrome (ACS). The role of surgical intervention in snakebite management remains controversial, with limited data available for snakebite envenomation. CASE PRESENTATION: Two cases of upper limb envenomation by Bitis nasicornis and Bitis gabonica were managed at the General University Hospital in Prague in year 2024. Both developed acute compartment syndrome requiring prompt antivenom therapy, fasciotomy, and intensive care. In the first case, antivenom (EchiTab-Plus-ICP) was given within 1 h, 10 vials in total, and fasciotomy at 10 h; the patient was discharged on day 16 with preserved limb function. In the second, antivenom (SAIMR) was administered within 3 h, 4 vials in total (the maximum available in Europe at that time), and fasciotomy at 8 h; recovery was complete by day 7. Diagnosis of ACS was based on clinical signs without intracompartmental pressure measurement.
conclusionThese cases highlight that timely surgical intervention, combined with intensive care and antivenin may play a critical role in preventing irreversible tissue damage following viperid envenomation. However, universal guidelines are lacking. Incorporating intracompartmental pressure monitoring into treatment protocols may further improve diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.