ArticleBMC geriatrics2025
Does income-related inequity exist in the utilization of home and community-based services among older adults in China? A cross-sectional study based on the China health and retirement longitudinal study 2018.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWith escalating population aging, the significance of ensuring equitable access to elderly care services is becoming increasingly prominent. This study explored whether inequity exists in home- and community-based service (HCBS) use among older adults in China, assessed the extent of inequity, and analyzed the factors influencing the utilization of HCBSs and the resulting inequities.
methodsThis study focused on older adults (aged 60 and above) using data from the 2018 wave of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. Variables from previous studies and the Anderson Behavioral model were classified into need and non-need factors for the analysis. Ultimately, 2823 participants were included. We used the concentration curve, concentration index (CI), and horizontal inequity (HI) to measure inequity in HCBS utilization. Through CI decomposition analysis, we examined the contribution of each factor to the overall inequity.
resultsIn the older adult population, with income levels ranging from low to high, service utilization showed an initial rising trend, and then a decline. Middle-income older adults used HCBSs the most under both actual and need-standardized scenarios, accounting for 24.12% and 25.08% of the total utilization, respectively. Low- and high-income older adults had lower HCBS utilization than middle-income older adults. The CI and HI for inequity in HCBS utilization among older Chinese adults were 0.085 (p < 0.01) and 0.064 (p < 0.01), respectively. A slight inequity in HCBS use among older adults in China was found in favor of higher-income users. The contribution of non-need factors to inequity in HCBS use was 450.93%, of which the contribution from income was 464.69% (some non-need factors contributed negatively to inequity). Differences in income significantly exacerbated the issue of fairness in HCBS usage, with low-income older individuals potentially more susceptible to experience inequities.
conclusionsGovernment-issued policies to promote the utilization of HCBSs by vulnerable older adults have achieved certain results. Middle-income older adults are more likely than those with higher incomes to use HCBSs. However, there is still inequity in service utilization, with low-income older adults showing less service utilization, which requires further government intervention. We propose recommendations for future policy improvements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.