ArticleJournal of community health2026
Effectiveness of a Community Health Worker-Delivered Depression Intervention for Uninsured Latine Immigrants.
Article in Journal of community health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Access to evidence-based mental health care remains limited for Latine immigrants. We tested the effectiveness of an evidence-based intervention, Strong Minds, delivered by community-health workers (CHWs) for improving depression symptoms. We used a single-arm pretest-posttest design to evaluate the effectiveness of Strong Minds in a sample of uninsured, Spanish-speaking, Latine immigrant adults recruited between October 7, 2020, and December 6, 2024. The intervention, adapted from cognitive behavioral therapy, includes 10 individual sessions. We performed a longitudinal analysis using linear mixed-effects models to estimate the trajectories of depression symptoms across five time points: baseline and sessions 1, 3, 6, and 9. Effectiveness was determined by changes in depression symptoms (PROMIS Depression 8a), and as a secondary outcome, changes in anxiety symptoms (PROMIS Anxiety 7a). We also analyzed potential selection bias by evaluating differences in baseline scores between participants who completed and discontinued participation. Of the 129 participants enrolled in the intervention (mean age, 39 years), 73 (56.6%) completed it (defined as attending at least 8 of 10 sessions). Completing the intervention was associated with improved symptoms of depression and anxiety. Participants with greater symptoms of depression at baseline were more likely than those with less severe symptoms to complete the intervention. These results add to the growing body of evidence in the United States that CHW-delivered mental health interventions are effective. Nonetheless, research is needed to rigorously demonstrate that CHW-delivered interventions are an equitable, clinically effective, sustainable, and scalable alternative to traditional models of mental health care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41430521What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.