SynthesisSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2025
A systematic review of pes anserinus variations, their anatomical types, prevalence, and clinical reflections.
Synthesis in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe pes anserinus (PA) is formed by the sartorius, gracilis, and semitendinosus tendons, serving as a common graft source in knee surgery. However, variations in tendon convergence, accessory slips, and insertion sites may directly affect surgical outcomes. This systematic review aimed to analyze the morphological variations of the PA, their prevalence, and clinical implications.
methodsFollowing PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a systematic search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar using the terms “pes anserinus,” “anatomy,” “morphology,” and “variation.” Eligible studies included human cadaveric or imaging-based investigations published in English after 2000. Study quality was assessed using the AXIS tool.
resultsFourteen studies comprising 769 knees were included. The pooled prevalence of the classical tri-tendinous configuration was 62%. Variations were most frequently observed in the semitendinosus tendon, while gracilis showed inconsistent rates across populations, and sartorius variations were rare. Accessory bands were reported in up to 100% of some series. These findings are clinically significant, as unrecognized variants may lead to graft insufficiency, stripper slippage, or diagnostic errors in imaging.
conclusionThe PA exhibits wide interindividual variability beyond the classical configuration. Awareness of these variations is essential for surgeons and radiologists to prevent complications. Larger studies incorporating biomechanical analyses are needed to better clarify the clinical importance of PA variations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41430502What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.