ArticleScientific reports2025
Automated, anatomy-based, heuristic post-processing reduces false positives and improves interpretability of deep learning intracranial aneurysm detection models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence for Cerebral Aneurysm Management: Integrating Imaging, Hemodynamics, and Clinical Decision Support.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Review
- Anatomically-guided masked autoencoder pre-training for aneurysm detection.IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision. IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep learning (DL) models can help detect intracranial aneurysms on CTA, but high false positive (FP) rates remain a barrier to clinical translation. We developed a fully automated method to reduce FP by integrating automated in-scan anatomic segmentation and removal of background and venous voxels into hybrid heuristic-DL pipelines. Two DL models, CPM-Net, and a deformable 3D convolutional neural network-transformer hybrid (3D-CNN-TR), trained with 1,186 open-source CTAs (1,373 annotated aneurysms) were integrated into an automated pipeline with heuristic post-processing modules comprising 5 combinations of an open-source brain mask and novel DL-based artery-vein separation modules which create artery, vein, and cavernous venous sinus (CVS) segmentation masks from unlabeled CTA data. FPs that do not overlap with the brain mask and/or overlap with vein or vein-more-than-artery masks were eliminated. Each pipeline was tested on 143 held-out private and 843 publicly available CTAs with 218 and 1027 annotated aneurysms, respectively. On our private dataset, CPM-Net yielded 139 true-positives (TP), 79 false-negative (FN), 126 FP, while 3D-CNN-TR yielded 179 TP, 39 FN, 182 FP. FPs were commonly extracranial (CPM-Net 27.3%; 3D-CNN-TR 42.3%), venous (CPM-Net 56.3%; 3D-CNN-TR 29.1%), arterial (CPM-Net 11.9%; 3D-CNN-TR 53.3%), and non-vascular (CPM-Net 25.4%; 3D-CNN-TR 9.3%) structures. Method 5 (combination of brain and vein-more-than-artery mask) performed best, reducing FP by 70.6% (89/126) and 51.6% (94/182) without reducing TP, lowering the FPR from 0.88 to 0.26, and from 1.27 to 0.62 for CPM-Net and 3D-CNN-TR, respectively. On the public RSNA dataset, CPM-Net yielded 791 TP, 236 FN, 748 FP, 0.89 FPR; while 3D-CNN-TR yielded 940 TP, 87 FN, 1552 FP, 1.84 FPR. Method 1 (enhanced brain mask) performed best at preserving TP, removing 1 and 4 TP for CPM-Net and 3D-CNN-TR, respectively, while removing 31.4% (235/748) and 33.8% (524/1552) of FP. Method 5 eliminated 57.9% and 43.8% of FP, but removed 24 and 25 TP from CPM-Net and 3D-CNN-TR output, respectively. Integration of interpretable, anatomy-based, background and vein removal modules into a fully automated DL-based aneurysm detection pipeline improved model performance on two external test datasets. This suggests that heuristic-DL hybrid pipelines created by integrating in-pipeline domain-informed heuristic post-processing with DL may increase performance and clinical acceptance of radiology domain AI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.