ArticleScientific reports2025
A statistical approach to model soil microbiota versus heavy metals: a case study on soil samples from Foggia, Southern Italy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heavy-metal (HM) contamination undermines soil functions and food safety, while risk appraisals often rely on chemical indices that can be unstable in the presence of extremes and only indirectly reflect biological integrity. We present an integrative framework that couples standardized contamination metrics with soil microbiome profiling to deliver stable, interpretable classifications and actionable bioindicators. Twelve peri-urban soils from Southern Italy were analysed for potentially toxic elements, including Arsenic (As), Cadmium (Cd), Chromium (Cr), Copper (Cu), Nickel (Ni), Lead (Pb), and Zinc (Zn) and profiled by shotgun metagenomics. We introduce a Standardized Ecological Risk index (SPERI) that preserves the ranking conveyed by conventional composites yet reduces outlier leverage. SPERI strongly agreed with Improved Potential Ecological Risk Index (IPERI) while stabilizing variance (R² = 0.896) and improved between-site comparability. Along the contamination gradient, community structure shifted consistently: families such as Pseudomonadaceae, Xanthomonadaceae and Rhodospirillaceae increased with risk, whereas Geodermatophilaceae and Nocardiaceae declined. Simple decision-tree models trained on family-level relative abundances reliably separated SPERI classes and repeatedly selected Zn- and Cd-enriched sites as primary split drivers, aligning microbial signals with chemical risk. By combining open, reproducible analytics with jointly chemical- and microbiome-informed endpoints, this workflow improves the interpretability and transferability of ecological risk assessment and supports targeted remediation and monitoring in contaminated agro-ecosystems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.