ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025
Deep learning-based non-contrast MRI model for nasopharyngeal carcinoma diagnosis: an end-to-end gadolinium-free solution.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Therapeutic Innovations in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Current Strategies and Emerging Perspectives.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Knowledge-Guided Framework for Synthesizing Contrast-Dependent Data from Multi-Sequence Non-Contrast MRI.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) diagnosis and routine follow-up for recurrence typically rely on contrast-enhanced MRI. This study introduces a deep learning model for diagnosing NPC using only non-contrast MRI, reducing the need for gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCA). This approach helps avoid safety concerns related to GBCA deposition, while also shortening scan times and reducing costs. In this study, we propose an innovative deep learning model for NPC diagnosis using only non-contrast MRI, reducing the need for gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCA). This approach not only mitigates potential safety concerns associated with residual GBCA deposition but also reduces scan time and examination costs. The study consisted of three phases. Firstly, a novel knowledge distilled modality fusion model is developed using a cohort of 854 cases and tested its performance on an internal set (257 cases, AUC = 0.95) and an independent external set (277 cases, AUC = 0.86). Secondly, the proposed method was compared with: (1) Non-contrast MRI without model improvement (Baseline 1) and (2) current virtual-contrast enhancement-based NPC diagnosis using three state-of-the-art methods (Baselines 2-4). The proposed model consistently outperformed Baselines 1 on both internal dataset (AUC: 0.95 vs. 0.93) and external test set (AUC: 0.86 vs. 0.82). Additionally, it surpassed Baselines 2-4, achieving performance gains of 6.7%, 69.8%, and 28.6% in AUC, over three state-of-the-art methods. Thirdly, the effectiveness of this model was evaluated through a fully crossed multi-reader, multi-case study involving 13 readers from 6 hospitals. The results showed that with AI assistance, readers could diagnose NPC using only non-contrast MRI, achieving results that were not inferior to contrast-enhanced imaging (AUC: 0.90 vs. 0.93, p<0.01). In conclusion, this study demonstrated the model's potential as a safe, cost-effective, and GBCA-free option for NPC diagnosis in clinical practice.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.