ArticleScientific reports2025
Coral relocation supports survival and growth in an urban reef of the Maldives.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coral reefs provide essential ecosystem services and livelihoods, particularly for small island nations like the Maldives. However, they are increasingly threatened by climate change and coastal modification. In 2022, the Greater Malé Connectivity Project (GMCP) commenced in North Malé Atoll, involving large-scale land reclamation and marine construction that affected adjacent coral reefs. As a mitigation measure, coral colonies were relocated to the reef surrounding Villimalé Island. Over two years of monitoring, relocated corals showed encouraging performance despite challenging environmental conditions. Overall survival reached 66%, with larger colonies outperforming smaller fragments and Pocillopora generally exhibiting higher growth and thermal resistance than Acropora. Growth rates declined with rising sea surface temperature, and mortality was primarily associated with tissue-loss responses rather than predation or ectosymbiotic colonisation. Health trajectories differed among coral types: Acropora fragments were more prone to bleaching, whereas Pocillopora colonies maintained tissue integrity but experienced chronic degradation. Despite these biological interactions and health challenges, many corals acclimatised to the urban reef environment, underscoring that coral relocation, when combined with species selection and size consideration, can serve as a viable short-term conservation tool in highly impacted systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.