ArticleScientific reports2025
Optimized YOLO architectures for efficient Kiwi detection in precision agriculture on embedded systems.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A learning-dynamics-driven framework for robust small-object detection in complex field environments: YOLOv11l-AGRI-EMA framework.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Liquid Biopsy in Primary CNS Tumors: Bridging Biology, Technology, and Clinical Care.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate and efficient fruit detection is essential for precision agriculture, particularly in densely occluded crops such as kiwifruit. This study presents a comprehensive benchmarking and optimization framework covering YOLOv8–YOLOv11 architectures for kiwi detection, evaluated under both high-performance training conditions and embedded deployment on an NVIDIA Jetson TX2. A field-collected dataset containing 2,925 training and 1,936 test annotations was used to train five sub-models (n, s, m, l, x) per YOLO version under identical settings. To enhance efficiency for edge deployment, a structured hyperparameter optimization procedure was applied to all “s” models, yielding substantial performance gains without additional architectural modifications. Among all evaluated models, the optimized YOLOv11s achieved the best accuracy–efficiency trade-off, reaching mAP@0.5 = 0.956, precision = 0.868, recall = 0.918, and an embedded inference time of 3.33 s/image on Jetson TX2. While larger models (e.g., YOLOv8x, YOLOv11l) attained slightly higher raw accuracies (up to mAP@0.5 = 0.957), their latency rendered them unsuitable for edge deployment. The results demonstrate that lightweight YOLO architectures, when supported by targeted hyperparameter tuning, can be effectively adapted for resource-constrained agricultural systems. The proposed evaluation and optimization pipeline provides a transferable methodology for other fruit-detection tasks and supports future development of embedded vision solutions in precision agriculture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.