Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41430415›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Taphonomic patterns of a WWI Alpine mass grave: insights from the Italian front.

Wiktoria Baranowska, Mauro Gobbi, Stefano Vanin, Franco Nicolis, Daniel Gaudio

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wiktoria BaranowskaDepartment of Archaeology, University of Durham, Durham, UK. wiktoria.baranowska07@gmail.com.
Mauro GobbiClimate and Ecology Unit, Research and Museum Collections Office, MUSE-Science Museum, Trento, Italy.
Stefano VaninDepartment of Earth, Environmental and Life Sciences-DISTAV, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Franco NicolisArchaeological Heritage Office of the Autonomous Province of Trento, Trento, Italy.
Daniel GaudioDepartment of Archaeology, University of Durham, Durham, UK. daniel.gaudio@durham.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding taphonomic patterns on skeletal remains, along with associated entomological evidence, remains a critical challenge in forensic and archaeological investigations. This study examines the specific impact of an Alpine environment on a WWI mass grave of 12 Austro-Hungarian soldiers (Cima Cady, Italy). Alongside general poor preservation caused by acidic soil erosion, a distinctive reddish staining affected over 80% of the skeletal elements. This was linked to the invasive root system of Juniperus sp., a plant species typical of Alpine zones, which had penetrated the grave and bone cavities. Additional unusual deterioration patterns were observed on tarsal elements that had been in contact with leather boots. Entomological evidence included the presence of Pterostichus multipunctatus and puparia of Protophormia terraenovae, known to mainly colonise exposed remains. The combined taphonomic and entomological findings provide important insights into the postmortem history of the remains and the environmental factors influencing their preservation. Collectively, these results support historical records and testimonies of the burial dynamics from over a century ago, and highlight the broader forensic potential of such evidence in reconstructing mass grave scenarios, including the contemporary investigations of human rights violations or war crimes.

Indexed as

Body RemainsBurialMilitary PersonnelAnimalsArchaeologyBone and BonesHumansItalyAlpine environmentForensic taphonomyMass gravePink teethReddish stainingWorld War I

Identifiers

PMID41430415
PMCPMC12749954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.