Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41430400›Full record

ArticleGene therapy2026

Secondary malignancy of T-cell origin after CAR T-cell therapy: EMA's conclusions from the evaluation of 38 suspected cases.

Philipp Berg, Charlotte Bakker, Moritz Sander, Nicklas Hasselblad Lundstrøm, Karin Erneholm, Flora Musuamba Tshinanu, Olga Kholmanshikh, Filip Van Nuffel, Susanne Müller, Gabriele Ruppert-Seipp and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gene therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Balancing Efficacy and Safety in Multiple Myeloma Patients Receiving B cell Maturation Antigen-Directed CAR T-Cell Therapy.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Philipp BergSafety of Biomedicines and Diagnostics, Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Langen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0674-9031
Charlotte BakkerQuality and Safety of Medicines Department, European Medicines Agency (EMA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands. charlotte.bakker@ema.europa.eu.ORCID 0000-0001-9822-2354
Moritz SanderThe Danish Medicines Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Nicklas Hasselblad LundstrømThe Danish Medicines Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Karin ErneholmThe Danish Medicines Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0009-0008-7999-2562
Flora Musuamba TshinanuFederal Agency for Medicines and Health Products, Brussels, Belgium.
Olga KholmanshikhFederal Agency for Medicines and Health Products, Brussels, Belgium.
Filip Van NuffelFederal Agency for Medicines and Health Products, Brussels, Belgium.
Susanne MüllerSafety of Biomedicines and Diagnostics, Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Langen, Germany.
Gabriele Ruppert-SeippSafety of Biomedicines and Diagnostics, Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Langen, Germany.
Gabriele D MaurerSafety of Biomedicines and Diagnostics, Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Langen, Germany.
Justina JanuskieneQuality and Safety of Medicines Department, European Medicines Agency (EMA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Maria MantziriQuality and Safety of Medicines Department, European Medicines Agency (EMA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bianca MulderPharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC), European Medicines Agency (EMA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Frederika A van NimwegenMedicines Evaluation Board, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Daiana VasilcanuSwedish Medical Products Agency, Uppsala, Sweden.
Ulla Wändel LimingaPharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC), European Medicines Agency (EMA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article provides a regulatory perspective on secondary malignancy of T-cell origin as a rare adverse reaction to the currently marketed CD19- or BCMA-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies. To assess the risk, causality between reported suspected adverse reactions and CAR T-cell therapy was assessed applying the principles of the World Health Organization-Uppsala Monitoring Centre causality categories, alongside a review of scientific publications and data from registries/ databases. By 11 April 2024, 38 cases of T-cell malignancy after CAR T-cell therapy were reported in patients aged 29-80 years. In 19 patients, tumour samples were tested for the presence of CAR transgene, which was detected in seven cases. Most of the T-cell malignancies were diagnosed within 12 months of treatment (22/33; 67%). The reporting rate is approximately one case per 1000 patients treated. An overall causal relationship was established with at least a reasonable possibility. Regulatory measures included updates to the product information, risk management plan, and educational materials. An additional pharmacovigilance activity was requested from the marketing authorisation holders (MAHs) to strengthen the process of genetic testing of residual tumour samples. To further characterise this risk and understand underlying mechanisms, continued efforts from healthcare professionals, MAHs and regulators are essential. Well-documented case reports, including information on genetic testing of tumour samples, are considered crucial elements.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy, AdoptiveNeoplasms, Second PrimaryReceptors, Chimeric AntigenT-LymphocytesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPharmacovigilanceReceptors, Chimeric Antigen

Identifiers

PMID41430400
PMCPMC13226032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.