ArticleScientific reports2025
Characterisation of intrusive memories and prediction from memory-related genes and cognitive and emotional factors.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Frontline caregivers, such as nurses and physicians, face heightened risk of intrusive memories, a core symptom of posttraumatic stress disorder. Understanding intrusions is key to protecting workers' mental health and sustaining effective patient care. Emergency department (ED) staff (N = 331) were assessed before starting ED work and three and six months later. Baseline measures included demographics, prior trauma, cognitive and emotional processing, and polymorphisms of the memory-related NR3C1, KIBRA, and ADRA2B genes as predictors of intrusions at three months, i.e., peak ED stress exposure. We examined intrusion occurrence, frequency, distress, and content, and investigated whether experiencing intrusions moderated changes in mental health from baseline to follow-ups. Intrusions were prevalent and often concerned potential patient care errors. Being a carrier of the G allele of the BCL1 polymorphism of the NR3C1 gene and ruminating were associated with intrusions at three months, while cognitive flexibility, emotional suppression, and emotion-focused positive rumination appeared protective. From baseline to three and six months, participants' anxiety increased, and those experiencing intrusions reported significantly lower work performance and engagement. Our results underline the psychological costs of high-stakes ED settings and suggest improvements to error culture and emotion regulation training as promising avenues to support staff and ultimately patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.